Source-backed AI screening

AI verdicts that cite the sentence in the resume.

No more “trust the AI”. Every AI verdict in ShortlistTable links to the exact resume sentence behind it. Click the cell to jump to the highlighted PDF, override the verdict with one click, ship a shortlist with the receipts attached. AI screening, with the audit trail recruiters and legal teams actually need.

Citations on every cell · Page + sentence reference · Export-preserving
shortlisttable.app / candidate / alice-chen
Candidate
Alice Chen
Backend platform engineer · 7y
Criterion
Has the candidate run Kafka in production for ≥ 12 months?
Yesverdict · source-backed
Evidence in resume
Built and operated Kafka streaming pipelines at Ledger from 2022-present. Owned primary on-call for the payments event bus.
Resume p.1 · Experience section · alice-chen.pdf
Every verdict in ShortlistTable links to the exact sentence in the resume that supports it. If we picked the wrong sentence, you adjust the column. If the sentence is right but the verdict is wrong, you override the cell.
100%
Cells with source citation
1-click
Jump to highlighted PDF
Page + line
Citation precision
All exports
Carry evidence columns
Why citations matter

A verdict without evidence is just sorted opinion.

The single biggest reason recruiters distrust AI screening is the lack of a clickable evidence trail. A model says “strong match” — based on what? Which sentence? Which page? If you cannot point at it, the verdict is hearsay.

Source-backed screening solves this by making the citation a first-class part of every cell. The verdict and the source sentence ship together, in the UI, in the audit log, and in the export. Disagreement becomes a productive conversation about the resume, not a stalemate about the algorithm.

Hiring manager debrief

“Why this candidate?” has an answer.

Instead of pointing at a fit score, you point at the sentence in the resume that backs each must-have. The conversation moves from arguing with the tool to evaluating the candidate.

Legal / compliance

Every screening decision has a paper trail.

If a candidate or regulator asks why someone was screened out, you can produce the criterion, the verdict, the source sentence, and any subsequent recruiter override — with timestamps.

Recruiter debugging

Wrong verdict? You can find out why.

When a verdict feels off, you click into the cell, see which sentence the engine matched against, and adjust either the column wording or the cell value. No mysterious model behaviour.

What source-backed means

Citations done the careful way.

01 · Feature

Sentence-level citations

Not “based on the resume” — the actual sentence. Lifted from the source document, attributable to a page and section.

Resume p.1 · ExperienceOwned primary on-call for the payments event bus across 14 services.
02 · Feature

Click to highlight in PDF

Click any cell, jump to the source resume with the sentence highlighted in place. No copying, no searching, no doubt.

alice-chen.pdfp.1 §ExperienceHighlighted
03 · Feature

Citations survive export

Every CSV / XLSX preset includes evidence columns next to verdict columns. The hiring manager sees both, your audit log sees both.

Verdict colEvidence colCitation colOverride col
04 · Feature

“Needs review” when silent

If the resume is silent on a criterion, we mark the cell as needs-review rather than fabricating a verdict. No citation, no answer.

Yes · sentence citedReview · no clear evidenceNo · evidence contradicts
05 · Feature

Override preserves history

When the recruiter changes a verdict, the original AI value and the source sentence both stay in the audit history alongside the override.

AI: review · resume p.2
Override: yes (recruiter note)
06 · Feature

Re-runnable on the same source

If you add a column or change the must-haves, we re-run only the affected cells against the same source documents. Citations stay stable.

Edit columnRe-run cellsNew citations
How it compares

Source-backed screening vs the alternatives.

PropertyBlack-box AIATS resume scoringSpreadsheetShortlistTable
Cell-level citationsRareNoneManual notesEvery cell
Click-to-PDF highlightNoNoN/ASentence highlighted in source
Evidence in exportsScore onlyRank onlyManual notesEvidence column per criterion
Override preserves historyNoLimitedLast write winsFull timestamped trail
Verdict when resume is silentOften guessesOften guessesBlankNeeds review
Supported Partial / manual Not supported
FAQ

Common questions on source-backed screening.

What happens if the resume doesn’t have evidence for a criterion?+

The cell is marked “needs review” with the reason. We don’t fabricate a citation — if the resume is silent, we say so explicitly and surface the cell to the reviewer.

Does the citation point at the page and the line, or just the document?+

Page, section, and the exact sentence. For PDFs, we also store the bounding box so the highlight stays accurate when you click through.

Do citations survive a CSV export?+

Yes. Every screening column gets a paired evidence column in the export. A hiring manager opening the CSV sees the verdict alongside the source sentence.

What if I disagree with which sentence the engine cited?+

Two paths: edit the column wording to be more specific, or override the cell directly with a recruiter note. Both edits are logged.

What file formats can be cited?+

PDF, DOCX, TXT, and pasted text. PDFs have the richest citation (page, section, highlight); DOCX and TXT cite the matched line.

Can I export a candidate report with all evidence inline?+

Yes — the candidate report preset bundles each verdict with its quote, source, and any recruiter override into a single PDF.

Trust, but verify

Build a shortlist with the receipts attached.

Every verdict carries the sentence behind it. Try it on 25 resumes — no credit card.